How long does it take to get the battery passport in order?
No fixed preparation time, but a firm deadline
The Battery Regulation does not prescribe how much time the preparation of a battery digital product passport may or must take. There is therefore no official lead time of, for example, several weeks or months. What is fixed, however, is the date by which the passport must be in place: for batteries placed on the market from 18 February 2027 onwards, the obligation under Article 77 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 applies, linked to the date of application in Article 96.
How much time it takes in practice to get such a passport in order depends on how much of the required data is already recorded somewhere — with the manufacturer, with a supplier, or in your own records — and on how that data is collected, verified and linked to a QR data carrier. For an importer who already receives detailed product information from the manufacturer, that step is smaller than for an importer who must first request or reconstruct data themselves. The date itself does not shift because of this.
Which batteries this applies to, and which (not yet)
This question about time is relevant for anyone placing batteries on the market that fall within the scope of Article 77: EV batteries, batteries for light means of transport (such as e-bikes and scooters) and industrial batteries above 2 kWh. For these categories, the obligation for a digital passport applies from the date of application onwards.
What is not covered here is the question of how long an individual company has already been or should be working on it — that is not a legal matter but a practical assessment that varies from situation to situation. Also, batteries that have already been placed on the market before the date of application fall outside the direct scope of this obligation at that time; the regulation is directed at batteries placed on the market after the date of application. For smaller batteries, below the 2 kWh threshold for industrial applications, this specific passport obligation does not apply on the basis of Article 77 either.
What is fixed: the date of application, not an intermediate schedule
From 18 February 2027, the obligation for a digital battery digital product passport applies to the categories mentioned, as follows from the relationship between Article 77 and Article 96 of the regulation. Until that date, there is no statutory intermediate step or phased obligation that is separately laid down in these articles — the transition is the presence or absence of the passport at the moment the battery is placed on the market.
This does not mean there is nothing to do until that date. It means that the text of the law itself does not prescribe intermediate milestones; that planning is up to the person who must deliver the passport. If an exact start date for your own preparation process has not yet been determined, that is a choice of the entrepreneur or importer itself, not something that follows from the regulation. What is fixed is only the end point: the date by which the passport must be in place.
How this is handled in practice
The first step is to check whether your own products fall under the categories of Article 77 — EV battery, battery for a light means of transport, or industrial battery above 2 kWh. Next, it is important to inventory which data is already available: technical specifications, origin of materials, and information that typically comes from the manufacturer. For an importer, much of that source data is often already with the manufacturer; the question is then mainly how that data is requested and provided.
Next comes the choice of how the product passport is compiled, hosted and linked to a QR data carrier on or with the product. This is the point at which a platform such as batpas.eu comes into play: the data supplied by the manufacturer or importer is processed into a passport, hosted, and provided with the corresponding QR code. How much time this entire process takes varies by provider and by the amount of data already available — but the sequence (inventory data, supply data, have passport compiled, link QR code) is in most cases the same, regardless of how long each step takes.
Where this follows from: article 77 and article 96
The obligation to have a digital battery product passport is set out in article 77 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1542. The date on which this obligation becomes applicable follows from article 96 of the same regulation, which governs entry into force and application. Together, these articles determine when the passport must be in place — not how long the preparation for it may take, as the regulation contains no provision on this.
Those who wish to begin are best advised to start with an inventory: which products fall within the categories of article 77, and which data on these products are already available from the manufacturer or in their own records. On the basis of this, it can be determined which data still need to be requested before a passport can be compiled and linked to a QR code.
What this is based on
- Regulation (EU) 2023/1542, Article 77 (battery passport)
- Regulation (EU) 2023/1542, Article 96 (entry into force and application)
The Regulation itself is on EUR-Lex. We refer for each statement; you need not believe us.
What you need to do concretely
What is expected of you
The time it takes to get a battery passport in order cannot be captured in a single figure — but its structure can. There are a few obligations that together determine how much work is involved, and for most companies with 10 to 100 employees these are manageable if tackled in time.
Collect and organize data
Article 77 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 (Battery Regulation) describes what information must be included in the passport: data on composition, origin, performance and what must be done with the battery at the end of its life. For a company that imports or trades batteries, this mainly means a search: what data has the manufacturer already provided, what is missing, and who must it be requested from. With an assortment of a couple of models this is straightforward; with dozens of variants and changing suppliers this can grow faster than expected. Those entering this for the first time often find that searching for the right data takes more time than filling in the passport itself.
A working passport per model or batch
The passport must be linked to a specific product and be accessible via the QR data carrier on the battery. This means that for each model — or per batch, depending on how the data differs — a passport must be compiled and published. For a company with a limited number of models this is a matter of days to weeks once the data is complete. With a broad or rapidly changing assortment it is advisable to allow for the fact that this process must be repeated per product line, and that the first time usually takes longer than subsequent times.
Testing before the passport goes live
A passport that exists but cannot be properly consulted via the QR code effectively does not meet the purpose of Article 77. Before a passport is put into use, it is customary to check whether the QR code is readable, whether the data is displayed correctly and whether the passport remains accessible after sale. Those who want to know how this is checked in practice will find more information in how do I check if my battery passport works correctly before I go live. This step is often overlooked in planning, even though it takes just as much time as compiling the data.
Ten years of hosting and ensuring accessibility
The passport must not only be correct at the time of sale, but must remain accessible throughout the entire period it is required to be consulted. This is not a one-off task but an ongoing obligation: those who host the passport themselves must find a way to continue doing so over the years, even with changes in the company, the website or the platform provider. This part takes little time to set up, but does require a structural arrangement — something that must not be forgotten at the end of the process.
Where things go wrong in practice
In practice, delays usually do not occur with the passport itself, but with what must come before it.
An importer discovers that the manufacturer in Asia does not provide all requested data as standard, and it takes weeks before the right contact person responds. A wholesaler finds that batteries already in stock present a different question than new purchases — that stock falls under a different regime, as described in what do I do with batteries already in stock, and this requires a separate process alongside the ongoing purchase.
A machinery manufacturer that installs batteries in their own equipment underestimates how much time it takes to determine whether the rules apply to their situation — a question that actually needs to be answered first, before time is spent on the rest of the process, see does the battery passport apply to my batteries.
An e-bike importer with a small assortment assumes that a small batch does not need a passport, and later discovers that quantity is not an exemption ground — which means preparation only begins at a time when there is little time left. More on this can be found in can I also create a battery passport if I only sell a few hundred units.
And in companies where the passport is drawn up internally by someone doing this alongside other tasks, the deadline often slips further back — not because the task itself is so demanding, but because it never rises to the top of the priority list until time really starts to tighten.
What you can record
To keep track of the lead time, it helps to document a number of matters in writing — not as a formality, but to prevent the process from stalling midway due to ambiguity.
- An overview of models and batches that require a passport, with the status of data collection per model.
- Contact agreements with manufacturers or suppliers on who supplies which data and within what timeframe — especially relevant when the origin lies outside the EU.
- A plan for existing stock, separate from the process for new procurement, as explained in what do I do with batteries already in stock.
- A step-by-step plan with sequence and responsibilities, for example structured according to how do I approach the battery passport step by step, so that it is clear which step must be completed when.
- A test moment before going live, documented as a fixed step in the process rather than a loose check afterwards.
- An agreement on long-term hosting, including who is responsible if the platform or supplier changes.
- A cost estimate per model, so that budget does not become a delaying factor once the data is ready — see also what does a battery passport cost.
Those who get these points down on paper early usually discover that the actual delay is not in the passport itself, but in the steps that come before it — and that those steps, provided they are started in time, can easily be completed well within the remaining time until 18 February 2027.
This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the legislation that this platform covers. We do not know your situation. If in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.
Written with AI based on the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-08-22. Is something wrong? Let us know — corrections take priority.