how do I check if my battery passport works correctly before I go live
Testing is possible, and advisable, before going live
A battery passport check before it becomes publicly accessible amounts to verifying three things: the QR code is on the battery and leads to the correct page, all mandatory information from Annex XIII is present and materially correct, and the page remains accessible in a manner consistent with what Article 77 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 (Battery Regulation) requires. This is not a legally prescribed test procedure — it is not described anywhere — but a practical check that prevents an error from only becoming apparent after the first batteries have already left the premises.
Testing itself is therefore not an obligation in its own right, but a logical step in the process that ends with a passport that meets legal requirements. Whoever tackles the battery passport step by step, will naturally reach the point where the information is complete and testing can take place before the QR code is applied to the first battery.
Which batteries this is relevant for, and which it is not
This check is relevant for every battery that falls under the obligation of Article 77: EV batteries, batteries for light means of transport such as e-bikes and scooters, and industrial batteries above 2 kWh. For batteries that do not fall into these categories — small consumer batteries, for example — the passport obligation does not apply, and a test in this form is therefore not required. Anyone unsure whether a particular product falls under the obligation will find the delimitation set out in the explanation about whether the battery passport applies to a specific battery.
It is also important to distinguish between testing before going live and the obligations that apply thereafter. Testing before going live is a one-time event, at the start of a product line or model. The obligations of the market participant under Articles 38 to 44 of the Battery Regulation — such as ensuring that information remains up to date — continue for as long as the battery is on the market. A test at going live therefore says nothing about whether the passport is still correct a year later; that is a separate, ongoing responsibility.
For batteries already in stock before the mandatory date, there is a separate consideration that is separate from this test question; this is set out in the section on what to do with batteries already in stock.
What is already established now, and what still needs to happen
The obligation to have a battery passport applies from 18 February 2027. Until that date, there is no legal obligation to already demonstrate a working passport, but that does not mean there is nothing to do. The period until the mandatory date is precisely the time to prepare the passport, fill it with the information from Annex XIII, and test whether everything is correct before the deadline becomes an issue. Whoever waits to test until shortly before the date risks that an error in the QR code, missing information, or an incorrect link between battery and passport only comes to light at a time when there is no room to correct it properly.
How much time that preparation — including testing — requires in practice depends on how many product types and data there are; an indication of this can be found in the overview on how long it takes to get in order.
What the check looks like in practice
The order in which a test is usually conducted begins with the QR code itself: scan with an ordinary phone and check whether the link works, without login or additional steps that a supervisory authority or consumer could not take. This is followed by a check of the content against Annex XIII: are all mandatory fields present, are chemical composition, capacity, origin and other information correctly taken from the documentation of the manufacturer or importer, and is there no information confused with another (think of a mix-up between batch number and model number).
Next, it is advisable to verify that the page aligns with what is stated in the EU declaration of conformity and the CE marking, as referred to in Articles 17 to 20 of the Battery Regulation — not because the passport follows the same procedure, but because conflicting data between the passport and conformity documentation is a signal that something is not right in the underlying process. After that, testing the durability of the link is relevant: once the QR code is affixed to the battery, does it continue to point to the same page, even after updates to the passport itself. For batteries that later receive a second life or are refurbished, it is moreover good to test in advance whether the passport is prepared for this; this aligns with the points of attention in the documents on second-hand and refurbished batteries and on giving a battery a second life.
Anyone who completes these steps before the first battery leaves the factory has a good indication of whether the passport does what it should do at the moment a competent authority asks about it; what can be checked in detail is described in the overview of what a supervisory authority requests during an inspection on batteries.
Where this is based on: Article 77 and Annex XIII
The substantive requirements for the battery passport derive from Article 77 and Annex XIII of Regulation (EU) 2023/1542. Annex XIII determines which data must be included; Article 77 describes the format and accessibility, including the link via a data carrier such as the QR code. The ongoing responsibility to keep data correct and up-to-date follows from Articles 38 to 44, which govern the obligations of economic operators. The relationship between the passport and the conformity assessment, including the EU declaration of conformity and the CE marking, is set out in Articles 17 to 20. A specific test procedure is not described in any of these articles; the check described here is a practical implementation to comply with these provisions, not a legally prescribed step.
If you have reached the point where testing can be carried out, you can place your own data collection alongside Annex XIII and have the QR code scanned on a test battery by a colleague who does not know the background — this often quickly shows whether the page also seems logical and complete to an outsider.
What this is based on
- Regulation (EU) 2023/1542, Article 77 (battery passport)
- Regulation (EU) 2023/1542, Annex XIII (data in the battery passport)
- Regulation (EU) 2023/1542, Articles 38 to 44 (obligations of economic operators)
- Regulation (EU) 2023/1542, Articles 17 to 20 (conformity assessment, EU declaration of conformity and CE marking)
The Regulation itself is on EUR-Lex. We refer for each statement; you need not believe us.
What you need to do concretely
What is expected of you
A battery passport that is live is not a file you submit once and then forget. It is a working link between a physical battery, a QR code on that battery, and a dataset that must be retrievable at any time. Before that system actually comes into use, there are a number of points on which you can test whether it also does what it should do.
The QR code must lead to the correct, current dataset
The link between the physical item and the digital passport is the core of Article 77 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 (Battery Regulation). In practical terms, this means that for a company with 10 to 100 employees it is tested whether the QR code on the battery itself, on the packaging or on accompanying documentation actually leads to the passport of that specific item or that specific batch — and not to a generic product page or an incorrect model variant. With an assortment containing multiple battery models, capacities or suppliers, this is a point where confusion easily arises.
The content must comply with Annex XIII
Annex XIII of Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 (Battery Regulation) lists which data must be included in the passport, depending on the type of battery. Testing here means: placing what actually appears in the passport alongside the list from Annex XIII and checking whether fields are missing, appear twice, or are filled with placeholder text that has never been replaced with actual product data. For an importer who supplies the same battery in multiple variants, it is common for testing to be done per variant, not once for the entire line.
The source of the data must be traceable
The obligations laid down in Articles 38 to 44 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 (Battery Regulation) allocate tasks between manufacturer, importer and distributor. For the purpose of testing a digital product passport, this means verifying where each piece of data originates and whether that party is also responsible for it. An importer who adopts cell chemistry or charge cycles from a manufacturer's datasheet tests whether that datasheet corresponds to the correct product version — particularly for batteries that retain the same model name after a revision or supplier change.
The link with CE marking and conformity must be correct
Articles 17 to 20 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 (Battery Regulation) govern conformity assessment and the EU declaration of conformity. The digital product passport is not separate from that process: testing also includes verifying whether the passport refers to a declaration of conformity that actually belongs to the product, and not to an earlier version whose technical specifications have since changed.
The data must remain current after going live
You do not test a passport only before going live, but also at the moment something changes: a supplier adjusts the cell chemistry, an importer changes the warranty period, or a batch receives a different recycling percentage. Testing then means checking whether that change actually appears in the live passport, and not only in the internal file.
Where things go wrong in practice
A number of situations recur regularly among companies testing a passport for the first time.
The QR code points to the wrong batch version. This occurs especially when a production line manufactures multiple batches of the same battery, and the code on the packaging has not been updated between batch one and batch two.
Fields from Annex XIII are present, but with outdated values. A charge cycle number copied from an earlier test report, while a later test produced a different number, is a common example — particularly for batteries that have undergone a technical modification in the meantime.
The passport tests well in the test environment, but breaks upon going live because the hosting environment uses a different URL structure than the one used when the QR code was generated. This occurs when testing and going live are carried out by different parties or at different times without the QR code being regenerated.
Data from the manufacturer and data from the importer appear side by side in the passport without it being clear which party has provided which piece of data — with the result that when a question arises about origin, no one can immediately point out where a specific piece of data comes from.
With an assortment containing a small number of variants, one passport is used as a template for multiple models, with the result that a model-specific field — such as capacity or dimensions — is forgotten to be updated. This occurs particularly with small production runs where creating a passport per model does not seem self-evident.
What you can record
Before a passport goes live, it is customary to document a number of matters in writing, so that a test is traceable and can be repeated for a subsequent batch or model change:
- A test protocol stating which fields from Annex XIII have been checked, per battery type or variant.
- An overview of which party has supplied which piece of data — manufacturer, importer or distributor — so that the allocation under Articles 38 to 44 remains traceable.
- A test log of the QR code: scanned on which specimen, on which date, with what result.
- A link between the passport and the corresponding EU declaration of conformity, so that if there is a change in the conformity assessment, the passport is also reviewed.
- A changelog for changes after going live: what has been adjusted, when, and by whom was that checked.
- A designated person within the organisation responsible for periodically checking whether the passport is still current.
For companies that have not yet completed these steps before, the overview of how the battery passport is built up step by step a logical starting point, and provides an estimate of the time needed to get everything in order an overview of how much realistic space to schedule for testing before the date on which the passport becomes mandatory. Anyone wondering how thoroughly a competent authority reviews this type of data afterwards will find more information at what a supervisory authority asks for in an inspection of batteries.
This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the legislation that this platform covers. We do not know your situation. If in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.
Written with AI based on the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-09-05. Is something incorrect? Let us know — corrections take priority.