How do I check if my supplier's data is correct?
The basics: checking data against the supplier's role
A supplier's data can be verified by comparing it with what the Battery Regulation requires of that specific link in the supply chain: a manufacturer has different obligations than an importer or distributor, and the supplied data should match accordingly. For a manufacturer, this includes the technical documentation that supports the EU declaration of conformity; for an importer or distributor, it is primarily a matter of checking whether those documents and the CE marking are present, not of reassessing their content. An importer or trader receiving data from a manufacturer therefore checks first and foremost whether the correct type of document is present, originating from the correct party, with a recognisable reference to the battery or battery model in question. If those references are missing, or if the model number differs from what appears on the battery itself, that is a concrete signal that the data should be examined more closely before being passed on.
Who this applies to, and what it does not
This check concerns everyone who acts as an economic operator within the meaning of the Regulation — manufacturer, authorised representative, importer or distributor — and covers the data they exchange or supply to each other, such as the EU declaration of conformity, the CE marking and the underlying technical documentation. It is not about a substantive reassessment of test results, chemical composition or lifetime data: an importer or distributor checks whether the documents are complete, consistent and from the correct party, not whether the laboratory work behind them is correct. That substantive examination is part of the conformity assessment that the manufacturer itself has carried out. Nor does it concern the content of the digital product passport itself; that is compiled from the data supplied by the manufacturer or importer, and the accuracy of those source data remains the responsibility of whoever supplies them, not of whoever processes or hosts them.
From when this becomes relevant
The obligation to maintain a digital product passport applies from 18 February 2027. Until that date, the obligations of economic operators under Articles 38 to 44 and the rules on conformity assessment, EU declaration of conformity and CE marking under Articles 17 to 20 already apply, irrespective of the passport: a battery placed on the market now should already be accompanied by an EU declaration of conformity and a CE marking. Checking supplier data is therefore not an issue that only arises from 2027 onwards; that check is already part of standard purchasing practice now. From that date, the product passport adds an additional layer to this: the same data must then also be available digitally, in structured form and via a QR data carrier.
How this is handled in practice
In practice, this begins with establishing your own role: whoever acts as an importer of e-bikes, scooters or industrial batteries above 2 kWh shall verify whether the manufacturer has issued an EU declaration of conformity that is specific to the battery model in question, and whether the CE marking has been affixed to the battery or packaging as described in Articles 17 to 20. Thereafter it is customary to check whether the data provided by the manufacturer — chemical composition, capacity, origin of raw materials and the other fields required for the product passport — are mutually consistent and correspond to what appears on the nameplate or in the accompanying documentation. Specific points of attention are a model number on the declaration that differs from the model number on the physical battery, missing signatures or dates, and documentation that refers to a different manufacturing process than the one supplied. Anyone in doubt as to whether the supplied data are complete may inquire about this with the manufacturer or original supplier: the regulation places responsibility for the accuracy of the data with that party, not with the person who receives and passes on the data.
Where this is based on: Articles 38-44 and 17-20
This follows from Articles 38 to 44 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1542, which describe the obligations of manufacturers, authorised representatives, importers and distributors separately, and from Articles 17 to 20, which concern conformity assessment, the EU declaration of conformity and CE marking. Together these articles determine who must compile, keep and pass on which data, and under what conditions a market participant may rely on the data of another link in the chain without having to reassess it substantively.
Whoever now receives supplier data for e-bike, scooter or industrial batteries can compare it against Articles 38 to 44 and 17 to 20 to verify whether their own role and the associated documents are correct. Batpas.eu subsequently processes that data into the digital product passport and hosts this for ten years with the associated QR data carrier, but the accuracy of the source data remains with whoever supplies it.
What this is based on
- Regulation (EU) 2023/1542, Articles 38 to 44 (obligations of economic operators)
- Regulation (EU) 2023/1542, Articles 17 to 20 (conformity assessment, EU declaration of conformity and CE marking)
The Regulation itself is on EUR-Lex. We refer for each statement; you need not believe us.
What you need to do concretely
What is expected of you
Whoever puts a battery on the market must not simply assume that the data supplied by a supplier is correct. Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 (Battery Regulation), Articles 38 to 44, divides responsibility between manufacturer, importer and distributor — and it is precisely this division that makes verification necessary, because the party that ultimately publishes the passport is not automatically the one that has measured or calculated the data.
Verifying that the supplied data corresponds to the battery type
A first check is simple but is often skipped: does the datasheet actually match the battery type being imported or traded? In companies with 10 to 100 employees, procurement often goes through multiple links, and it happens that a supplier forwards data from a similar — but not identical — cell type. This can be identified by model numbers, cell chemistry and capacity values that do not exactly match what is stated on the packaging or in the order confirmation.
Verifying that the declaration of conformity belongs to the correct battery
Regulation (EU) 2023/1542, Articles 17 to 20, governs conformity assessment, the EU declaration of conformity and CE marking. A declaration of conformity supplied by a supplier should refer to the specific battery model or production batch in question. A generic declaration that applies to an entire product line, without a clear link to the delivered batch, provides less certainty than a declaration that is specifically attributed.
Verifying that the origin of critical raw materials is substantiated
For batteries containing cobalt, lithium, nickel or graphite, the origin information should be substantiated — not merely stated. This relates to what the due diligence obligation for batteries entails and to the question what exactly is requested about cobalt, lithium and graphite from risk areas. A supplier that only writes "in accordance with regulation" without further substantiation is effectively providing no verifiable information.
Verifying that data from sub-contractors has been processed
For batteries that are assembled from loose cells and their own housing or BMS, information from multiple parties comes together. The cell supplier provides different data than the party that assembles the final product. It is then important to be able to verify what data was requested from the cell supplier and whether that data has actually been passed on to the final passport, rather than replaced by estimates.
Where things go wrong in practice
A few situations regularly occur with companies that import or trade batteries.
An importer receives a technical datasheet in English or Chinese in which units or test conditions do not match the European standard expected in the passport data. The figures appear complete, but cannot be used without adaptation.
A supplier sends the same declaration of conformity for multiple production series, while in the meantime a change in cell chemistry or capacity has been made. The declaration then no longer covers the batch actually being supplied.
For a battery pack assembled from cells from one factory and a BMS from another party, it turns out afterwards that no one in the chain has passed on the complete set of data — each party assumed that another had already filled in that responsibility.
A trading company works with two suppliers for what at first glance is the same battery, but the technical data supplied by both parties differ in some respects. This is a situation that requires an approach as described in what to do if the same battery comes from different suppliers.
Finally, it happens that a supplier does not supply data at all, or only after repeated requests — a situation for which specific guidance has been provided on what to do if a supplier does not supply the data.
What you can record
A number of documents and agreements make it easier to track the verification of supplier data:
- The manufacturer's original technical datasheet, alongside — not instead of — any translated or summarized version.
- The EU declaration of conformity, with a clear link to the specific battery model and, where possible, the production batch or order number.
- Correspondence in which data requirements for the passport have been requested — an overview of which data is precisely requested from a battery supplier is a useful starting point in this regard.
- A documented agreement in the purchase contract about who supplies which data, in which format and at what time — see how the supply of passport data is laid down in a purchase contract.
- A note on the format in which data has been received versus the format required for the passport, including any conversions or adjustments — relevant to the question in which format battery data must be supplied.
- For batteries from a factory outside the EU: an overview of the questions asked and answers received, as detailed in how the correct passport data from a manufacturer in China is obtained.
Whoever places these documents side by side can usually quickly see whether the supplier data are internally consistent and whether they align with the battery actually being traded. This is not a guarantee that the data are correct, but it makes visible where data is missing, outdated, or does not fit the specific product — and that is precisely what a check amounts to in practice.
This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the legislation that this platform covers. We do not know your situation. If in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.
Written with AI based on the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-08-22. Is something wrong? Let us know — corrections take priority.