batpas.eu

How often must I update the data in the battery passport?

Static data entered once, condition data updated continuously

The battery passport consists of two types of information that handle time differently. Some information is recorded when the battery is placed on the market and does not change thereafter: chemical composition, manufacturer, production location, production date. Another part concerns the condition and expected service life of the battery, and this does change while the battery is in use. For that second part, the starting point is that the passport shows the current state, not the situation on the day the battery left the factory. The regulation does not specify a fixed interval — there is no "every so many months" or "annually" in the text. What is clear, however, is the distinction: static data need only be correct once, data on condition and expected service life are intended to track the battery's progress.

Who this applies to and what falls outside

This distinction applies to batteries that fall under the passport: EV batteries, batteries for light means of transport such as e-bikes and scooters, and industrial batteries above 2 kWh. The question of up-to-dateness is especially relevant for batteries with a long service life and whose condition changes during use — an EV battery that has less capacity after years, or an industrial battery that receives a different health status after cell repair or replacement. This is not about whether the manufacturer must ever change its company name, nor is it about a general obligation to continuously review random fields in the passport. It concerns specifically the information that the regulation classifies under "condition and expected service life". For data that are by definition fixed at manufacture, there is no reason to update them over time.

From 18 February 2027, current status not yet detailed

The obligation to maintain a battery passport applies from 18 February 2027. Until that date, there is no legal obligation on this point, nor is there an obligation to maintain condition data in the manner that the regulation will then prescribe. How often and in what manner the condition data must be updated precisely is not worked out in the regulation text itself to a specific interval or specific procedure. Those waiting for a ready-made answer in the form of "every quarter" or "at every service interval" will not find that in Article 77 or Article 14. What is established is the principle — current condition information belongs in the passport — not the frequency at which this must happen.

What this means for maintaining the passport

In practice, it is useful to first determine which data in a battery's passport are static and which are dynamic. The static data — origin, composition, manufacturing data — are provided once and need not be revisited thereafter. The dynamic data, on condition and expected service life, require a source: usually that is data from the battery management system, or information established during maintenance, repair or replacement. A logical sequence is then: determine who or what generates this condition data (the battery management system, a service partner, the importer themselves), find a way to pass that data to the place where the passport is hosted, and ensure that the QR code on the battery always points to the current version of the passport rather than to a fixed snapshot. For those having the passport hosted by a third party, it makes sense to agree beforehand how and through which channel supplied condition data reach the passport, and who is responsible for this once the battery is in use with the end user.

Basis: Article 77 and Article 14

Article 77 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 (Battery Regulation) governs the battery passport itself: which batteries fall under it, that the passport must be accessible via an electronic data carrier, and which categories of information belong in it. Article 14 of the same regulation specifically addresses information about the condition and expected lifespan of the battery — this is the article from which the dynamic, time-bound nature of part of the passport data follows. For the exact content and wording of both articles, the official text of the regulation is the source.

What to do now

For anyone importing or trading e-bikes, scooters or industrial batteries, it is practical to already map out which condition data about their own batteries are available or can be made available — for example via the battery management system — and to think about a fixed procedure for providing those data once the passport becomes mandatory. Batpas.eu compiles the passport from the supplied data and hosts it for ten years; anyone who has a process in place beforehand for passing on condition updates will be ready faster.

What this is based on

The Regulation itself is on EUR-Lex. We refer for each statement; you need not believe us.

What you need to do concretely

What is expected of you

Article 77 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 (battery regulation) stipulates that the battery passport must be accessible via the QR data carrier, linked to a unique identification code, and that the data contained therein must be correct throughout its term. What the regulation does not do is prescribe a fixed schedule for reviewing each data source. This does not mean that updating is optional — it means that the frequency is linked to the nature of the data itself.

Record static data correctly once

Part of the data in the passport is fixed as soon as the battery leaves the factory: the battery chemistry, the material composition, the CO2 footprint during production, the proportion of recycled material. For a company with 10 to 100 employees, this means above all that this data must be carefully transferred from the manufacturer's documentation when the passport is first created. How battery chemistry is recorded in the passport and how the proportion of recycled cobalt, lithium, nickel and lead is demonstrated, is work that is done thoroughly once and then rarely changes — unless the manufacturer itself makes a product modification.

Dynamic data that moves with use

Another part of the passport describes precisely the condition of the battery during the use phase. Article 14 mentions information about the condition and expected lifetime, which in practice amounts to data that changes as the battery ages and undergoes more charge cycles. For an importer or trader, this means that the passport cannot be treated as a form that is filled in once: where in the product the measurement data originate (for example via a battery management system) and how that data finds its way to the passport is a question that must be answered per product line. What the state of health of a battery precisely means and why that data must be included, also determines how often an update makes sense.

Implement changes in the supply chain

A third category concerns data that changes because something in the supply chain or in the company's own operations changes: a new supplier of cells, a modified recycling trajectory at the end of the product life, or a change in the party responsible for the passport. This affects, among other things, the data on collection and recycling and the question of which party is allowed to modify which data. For a company of average size, this means that someone inside the company must be designated to identify this type of change, because such changes rarely reach the passport automatically.

Where things go wrong in practice

A first situation that often occurs: the passport is neatly filled in when a product line is launched, but no one within the company is assigned to maintain it once the first batteries enter the use phase. The data on condition and lifetime then remain at the starting value, while the battery is meanwhile in use for years.

A second situation: an importer switches cell suppliers without the change in material composition or chemistry being carried through in existing passports of previously supplied batteries. The passport of a new batch is correct, but older passports still refer to the old specification while the product model bears the same name.

A third situation arises in companies that have the passport hosted by a third party, but do not themselves record who submitted which change and when. If a supervisor asks how a particular piece of data came about, there is then no trace to be found.

A fourth situation: the end-of-life trajectory changes — a new recycling partner, a different collection point — but this change does not reach the party managing the passport, because the operations department and the party responsible for product compliance do not communicate with each other.

A fifth situation arises with companies that believe the product passport is "complete" once delivered, whereas in fact the data falling under Article 14 is by definition a snapshot that becomes outdated as soon as the battery is used.

What you can record

  • An overview of which data in the product passport are static (chemistry, material composition, CO2 footprint at production) and which are dynamic (condition, expected lifetime), so that it is clear which data needs to be reviewed and for what reason.
  • An internal designation of the person or department responsible for flagging changes in the supply chain, such as a different cell supplier or a modified recycling process.
  • A file per product line documenting the source of each piece of data in the product passport — manufacturer specification, own measurement, or third party — so that in case of a later query it can be traced how the data originated.
  • Agreements with the party hosting the product passport (for example batpas.eu) on who may make a change and within what timeframe a submitted change is processed.
  • A fixed procedure for when a product modification takes place — new cell, different material, different supplier — so that it is immediately clear which product passports need to be updated and which do not.
  • An overview of who may view and modify which data, which aligns with the question who may view which data from the battery passport, and on the consideration of whether certain data are commercially sensitive and thus should not be made public without further ado, as described in protecting commercially sensitive data.

This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the legislation that this platform covers. We do not know your situation. If in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.

Written with AI based on the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-08-22. Is something wrong? Let us know — corrections take priority.